🔗 Share this article

McLaren and F1 could do with anything decisive during this title fight between Norris and Oscar Piastri getting resolved on the track rather than without resorting to team orders as the championship finale begins at the COTA starting Friday.

Singapore Grand Prix fallout leads to internal strain

After the Marina Bay event’s doubtless extensive and tense debriefs concluded, McLaren will be hoping for a reset. Norris was almost certainly fully conscious about the historical parallels of his riposte to his aggrieved teammate during the previous race weekend. During an intense title fight with the Australian, that Norris invoked a famous Senna most famous sentiments was lost on no one yet the occurrence which triggered his statement was of an entirely different nature from incidents characterizing Senna's great rivalries.

“If you fault me for just going on the inside of a big gap then you should not be in F1,” stated Norris of his opening-lap attempt to overtake which resulted in their vehicles making contact.

His comment appeared to paraphrase the Brazilian legend's “If you no longer go for a gap which is there then you cease to be a true racer” justification he provided to Sir Jackie Stewart following his collision with Alain Prost at Suzuka back in 1990, securing him the championship.

Parallel mindset yet distinct situations

Although the attitude remains comparable, the wording marks where parallels stop. The late champion confessed he never intended of letting Prost to defeat him at turn one whereas Norris attempted to make his pass cleanly at the Marina Bay circuit. Indeed, his maneuver was legitimate that went unpenalised despite the minor contact he made against his team colleague during the pass. This incident was a result of him clipping the car driven by Verstappen in front of him.

Piastri reacted furiously and, notably, instantly stated that Norris gaining the place was “unfair”; suggesting that their collision was verboten by team protocols of engagement and Norris ought to be told to return the position he gained. The team refused, but it was indicative that during disputes of contention, both will promptly appeal the squad to intervene on his behalf.

Team dynamics and fairness being examined

This is part and parcel from McLaren's commendable approach to allow their racers compete one another and strive to be as scrupulously fair. Quite apart from creating complex dilemmas in setting precedents over what constitutes just or unjust – which, under these auspices, now covers misfortune, tactical calls and racing incidents like in Marina Bay – there is the question regarding opinions.

Of most import for the championship, with six meetings remaining, Piastri leads Norris by 22 points, each racer's view exists as fair and at what point their perspectives might split from the team's stance. That is when the amicable relationship between the two could eventually – turn somewhat into Senna-Prost.

“It will reach a point where a few points will matter,” commented Mercedes boss Toto Wolff post-race. “Then they’ll start to calculate and back-calculate and I suppose the elbows are going to come out a bit more. That's when it begins to become thrilling.”

Audience expectations and title consequences

For the audience, in what is a two-horse race, increased excitement will probably be welcomed as an on-track confrontation rather than a spreadsheet-based arbitration of circumstances. Especially since for F1 the alternative perception from all this isn't very inspiring.

Honestly speaking, McLaren is taking the correct decisions for themselves with successful results. They secured their tenth team championship at Marina Bay (though a great achievement overshadowed by the controversy from their drivers' clash) and with Stella as squad leader they possess a moral and principled leader who genuinely wants to do the right thing.

Sporting integrity versus squad control

However, with racers in a championship fight appealing to the team for resolutions is unedifying. Their competition should be decided through racing. Chance and fate will play their part, yet preferable to allow them just battle freely and observe outcomes naturally, rather than the sense that every disputed moment will be analyzed intensely by the squad to determine if they need to intervene and then cleared up afterwards behind closed doors.

The examination will intensify and each time it happens it risks possibly affecting outcomes that could be critical. Already, following the team's decision for position swaps in Italy because Norris had endured a delayed stop and Piastri feeling he had been hard done by regarding tactics in Budapest, where Norris triumphed, the spectre of a fear of favouritism also emerges.

Squad viewpoint and upcoming tests

Nobody desires to see a title endlessly debated because it may be considered that the efforts to be fair had not been balanced. When asked if he felt the team had acted correctly by both drivers, Piastri responded that they did, but noted it's a developing process.

“We've had several challenging moments and we’ve spoken about various aspects,” he said after Singapore. “But ultimately it’s a learning process with the whole team.”

Six races stay. McLaren have little wriggle room left to do their cramming, so it may be better now to simply stop analyzing and step back from the conflict.